PRESSURE ULCERS (BEDSORES, DECUBITUS ULCERS): COMPLICATION AND CLINICAL STRATEGY OF COMPLEX TREATMENT IN A PALLIATIVE CARE DEPARTMENT FROM THE POSITION OF CLINICAL EXPERIENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/health-2024.1.2

Keywords:

local purulent-necrotic process, pressure ulcers (bedsores, decubitus ulcers), classification criteria, features of prevention, strategies of complex treatment

Abstract

Bedsores (syn. pressure ulcers – Decubitis ulcers) are caused by chronic compression, soft tissues ischemia and neurotrophic changes, inadequate nutrition and care, urinary and fecal incontinence, metabolic disorders due to the underlying disease; localized microcirculatory disorders; metabolic disorders. Modern scientific research is mainly aimed at developing strategies and methods for the treatment of pressure ulcers that have already formed, which is a local purulent-necrotic process. There is no clear consensus on the criteria for readiness of bedsores (which affects the outcome of surgery) for surgical treatment, which ultimately determines the length of the hospital care of palliative patient's. The aim of the work was to optimize the strategy of complex surgical treatment of stage III-IV bedsores and purulent complications in some palliative care clinic. A case of bedsores (pressure ulcers, decubitus ulcers) especially stage III-IV from palliative care department is being investigated. The total sample of the retro- and prospective analysis included the results of the complex treatment of 412 patients aged 40–93 years: 174 males and 238 females with soft tissue pressure ulcers. Stage I and II pressure ulcers were treated conservatively. In the presence of purulent complications, complex surgical sanation was performed. Clinical plans and treatment included adequate nutritional support, decompression of the area, sanation of pressure ulcers with antiseptics, including surgical intervention if necessary, adequate local and systemic infection control, and correction of background comorbidities. Based on author's clinical classification and the DOMINATE strategy, we created a simplified strategy, pathogenetically based and adapted for the treatment of pressure ulcers in a palliative care department with an adequate sequence of care and complex therapy. If it was impossible to simultaneously remove necrotic masses from the standpoint of monitoring the patient's general condition or additional/repeated necrosis formation, we used strategies of complex treatment according to standard clinical protocols, tactics of programmed resanitations/renecrectomies, and antibacterial therapy. Our proposed clinical classification criteria and adapted NODITE clinical strategy are simple and easy to use. Significant reduction of pain, signs of purulent necrotic inflammation and effective secondary prevention of complications constitute a set of criteria for effectiveness and economic feasibility, which, in our opinion, determines the possibility of introducing into clinical practice. Using the NODITE strategy, we found complete healing of complicated pressure ulcers within 45–60 days in half of the patients in the main group, while in the control group, this figure was only 35.7%. It has been shown that adequate local restriction and sanation of the problem area and the use of special anti-decubitus mattresses in palliative care departments contribute to the regression of the pathological process, granulation and marginal wound epithelialization. The strategy for the prevention, care and treatment of complicated bedsores includes N (Nutrition) – adequate nutritional support; O (Offloading) – offloading, decompression – external pressure reduction on the bedsores area by the use of special care products and orthopedic devices, which contributes to the proliferative phase of the wound process; D (Debridement) – opening, removal of pus and necrosis from the wound with precise step-by-step necro- and (if necessary) sequestrnecrectomy, with drainage of purulent cavity; I (infection) – the most appropriate combination of general antibiotic therapy and topical application of antiseptics and antibiotics; T (tissue management) – creating an appropriate environment in the wound, care, and stimulation of marginal epithelization; E (education) – providing appropriate care, monitoring the dynamics of the pressure ulcer wound process and correcting local venous and/or lymphatic stasis.

References

Alderden J., JoAnne D., Whitney J.D., Shirley M., Taylor S.M., Zaratkiewicz S. Risk profile characteristics associated with outcomes of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a retrospective review. Critical Care Nurse. 2011. № 31(4). P. 30–43. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2011806.

Angel D.E., Lloyd P., Carville K., Santamaria N. The clinical efficacy of two semi-quantitative wound-swabbing techniques in identifying the causative organism (s) in infected cutaneous wounds. Int Wound J. 2011. № 8(2). P. 176–185. https://doi.org/.10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00765.x.

Bates-Jensen B.M., Guihan M., Garber S.L., Amy S., Chin A.S., Stephen P., Burns S.P. Characteristics of recurrent pressure ulcers in veterans with spinal cord injury. J. Spinal Cord Med. 2009. № 32(1). P. 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2009.11760750.

Biglari B., Büchler A., Reitzel T., Swing T., Gerner H.J., Ferbert T. et al. A retrospective study on flap complications after pressure ulcer surgery in spinal cord-injured patients. Spinal Cord. 2014. № 52(1). P. 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.130.

Cao Y., Krause J.S., DiPiro N. Risk factors for mortality after spinal cord injury in the USA. Spinal Cord. 2013.№ 51(5). P. 413–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.2.

Cowan L.J., Stechmiller J. Prevalence of wet-to-dry dressings in wound care. Adv Skin Wound care. 2009. № 12(22). P. 567–573. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000363469.25740.74 .

DeJong, G., Hsieh C.-H.J., Brown P., Smout R.J., Horn S.D., Ballard P. et al. Factors associated with pressure ulcer risk in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2014. № 93(11). P. 971–986. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000117.

Díez-Manglano J. Úlceras por presión: otro evento adverso prevenible. Revista Clínica Española. 2021. № 217(4). P. 242–243. https://doi.org/10.12968/ jowc.2020.29.LatAm_sup_2.6.

Balcázar-Rueda E., León-López A.A. Educación continua del personal de enfermería, una estrategia de prevención de úlceras por presión intrahospitalarias. Medigraphic. 2018. № 26(3). P . 2 02–213. [cited 2023 Jun 16]; Available from: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/enfermeriaimss/eim-2018/eim183g.pdf.

Cortés O.L., Herrera-Galindo M., Villar Ju.C., Rojas Yu.A., del Pilar Paipa M., Salazar L. Frequency of repositioning for preventing pressure ulcers in patients hospitalized in ICU: protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial. Revista Medica Herediana. Pubmed. BMC Nurs. 2021. № 20(1). P. 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00616-0. [cited 2023 Feb 12]; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256643/.

Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers (Protocol). Ed. Maggie J Westby et al. and Cochrane Wounds Group. 2017. The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 21 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011947.pub2.

Eslami V., Saadat S., Habibi Arejan R., Vaccaro A.R., Ghodsi S.M., Rahimi-Movaghar V. Factors associated with the

development of pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2012. № 50(12). P. 899–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.75.

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP). SCALE: skin changes at life’s end. Final consensus statement. Fin.ed. R. Gary Sibbald, Diane L. Krasner, James Lutz, October 1, 2009. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2010. № 23(5). P. 225–238. [cited 2023 Feb 10]; Available from: https://www.epuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/SCALE-Final-Version-2009.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000363537.75328.36.

Ferris A., Price A., Harding K. Pressure ulcers in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine. 2019. № 33(7). P. 770–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319846023.

Garza – Hernández R., Meléndez Méndez M.C., de los Ángeles Fang Huerta M., González Salinas J.F., Castañeda-Hidalgo H., Argumedo Pérez N.E. Conocimiento, actitud y barreras en enfermeras hacia las medidas de preveención de úlceras por presión. Scierlo. 2023. № 3. P. 47–58. [cited 2023 Feb 10]; Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28392097/. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95532017000300047.

Gefen A. Pressure ulcer prevention dressing design and biomechanical efficacy. J. Wound Care. 2020. № 29. P. 6–15. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2020.29.Sup12.S6.

Latimer S., Chaboyer W., Thalib L., McInnes E., Bucknall T., Gillespie B.M. Prevalencia y predictores de lesiones por presión entre adultos mayores en las primeras 36 horas de hospitalización. № Scierlo. 2019. № 28. P. 4119–4127. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.106.

Levy A., Gefen A. Assessment of the Biomechanical Effects of Prophylactic Sacral Dressings on Tissue Loads: A Computational Modeling Analysis, Ostomy Wound Manag. 2017. № 63. P. 48–55. https://doi.org/10.25270/owm.10.4855.

López-Casanova P, Verdú-Soriano J., Berenguer-Pérez M., Soldevilla-Agreda J. Prevención de las úlceras por presión y los cambios de postura. Revisión integrativa de la literatura. Scielo. 2018. № 29(2). P. 92–99.

Lustig M., Wiggermann N., Gefen A. How patient migration in bed affects the sacral soft tissue loading and thereby the risk for a hospital-acquired pressure injury, Int. Wound J. 2020. № 17. P. 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13316.

Moore Z.E., Webster J. Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 06 December 2018. CD009362 . https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009362.pub3.

Miller S.K., Sharma N., Aberegg L.C., Blasiole K.N.; Fulton J.A. Analysis of the Pressure Distribution. Qualities of a Silicone Border Foam Dressing, J. Wound, Ostomy Cont. Nurs. 2015. № 42. P. 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000130.

Rodríguez-Cruz D.L., Landaverde C.H., Núñez F.C.,Lavoignet Acosta B.J. Proceso enfermero aplicado a un paciente con úlceras por presión. Vive Rev. Salud. 2020. № 3(9). P. 253–264. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistavive.v3i9.64.

Sánchez-Munoz L.A. Úlceras por presión: otro evento adverso prevenible. Revista Clínica Española. 2017. № 217(4). P. 242–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2016.12.016.

Scheel-Sailer А. Wyss A., Boldt C., Post M.W., Lay V. Prevalence, location, grade of pressure ulcers and association with specific patient characteristics in adult spinal cord injury patients during the hospital stay: a prospective cohort study. Spinal Cord. 2013. № 51(11). P. 828–833. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.91.

Shiferaw W.S., Aynalem Y.A., Akalu T.Y. Prevalence of pressure ulcers among hospitalized adult patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Dermatol. 2020. № 20. P. 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-020-00112-z.

Vergun A.R. The method of predicting the risk of repeated necroctomies in patients with soft tissue bedsores. Patent of Ukraine. 2017; Vergun A.R. 114267U, IPC. A61B17/00. Publ. 10.03.2017: Bull. 5.

Vergun A.R. The method of treatment of purulent soft tissues bedsores, complicated by purulent effusions. Patent of Ukraine. 2019; Vergun A.R. et al. 131008U, IPC A61G7/057. Publ. 10.01.2019: Bull. 1.

Vergun A.R. The method of treatment of the III–IV stages purulent soft tissues bedsores. Patent of Ukraine. 2017; Vergun A.R. et al. 114588U, IPC. A61B17/00. Publ. 10.03.2017: Bull. 5.

Warner D.J. A clinical comparison of two pressure-reducing surfaces in the management of pressure ulcers. Decubitus. 1992. № 5(3). P. 52–64 [cited 2023 Feb 22]; Available from: PMID: 1596352.

Waterlow J. Pressure sores: A risk assessment card. Nurs Times. 1985. № 81(48). P. 49–55. PMID: 3853163.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-23

Issue

Section

MEDICINE