ANALYSIS OF APPROACHES AND METHODS IN TEACHING PHYSIOLOGY TO STUDENTS OF MEDICAL UNIVERSITIES IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/health-2024.1.25Keywords:
analysis of teaching methods, innovative forms and methods, physiology, students, higher medical educationAbstract
The article is dedicated to the analysis of approaches to teaching physiology of students of medical universities in different countries of the world, and the methods that are most appropriate to use in teaching physiology in Ukraine to improve the effectiveness of the educational process are analyzed. The authors conducted a bibliographic, informational and semantic search of sources regarding the approaches and technological methods used in the teaching of physiology in medical educational institutions. Materials from PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were processed. A systematic review of original studies and reviews published between 2000 and 2023 was performed. Articles were selected and screened according to PRISMA guidelines. Modern methods of teaching physiology in medical education include the following main types: lectures, practical and laboratory work, educational experiments, cooperative learning, problem-oriented learning, learning through observation, learning based on specific cases (case technologies), flipped class, team learning, learning based on modeling, online learning, mastering the methods of evidence-based medicine. The widespread implementation of teaching methods that reduce the interaction between teachers and students, increase the relative time of independent study or study in a student group, has positive aspects, but carries a number of risks. Reducing the duration of supervised learning, increasing the time spent on finding solutions to educational tasks, increasing the probability that a student does not receive individual help from a teacher in difficult questions – these and other features of innovative methods should be taken into account especially carefully during the study of fundamental scientific disciplines that form a systematic ideas about biological processes, but the experience and skills of educational work in many students are not yet sufficiently formed. The introduction of problem-oriented learning into medical education caused concern in the medical and scientific community about the risk of gaps in the fundamental knowledge of physiological processes, which negatively affects the specialist's ability to assess non-standard medical situations. In response to this, the European Physiological Society developed a physiology curriculum for medical students “Physiological Objectives for Medical Students”. It includes 10 chapters, which include the basic concepts of physiology, a plan for studying body systems and the principles of their regulation. Analysis of the experience of using different teaching methods shows that each of them has its positive features and disadvantages. Most of the innovative methods are focused on the activation of students' educational activities, the development of their teamwork skills, the formation of analytical skills, and the creation of interdisciplinary, systemic knowledge. But each of the methods also has disadvantages, which makes it impossible to use it as the only recommended one. Blended learning with the use of high-tech methods of information support, with the use of virtual and model experiments and the expansion of their application in order to fully replace experiments on animals, actualization of knowledge is recommended and necessary in the modern world.
References
Michael, J. (2007). What makes physiology hard for students to learn? Results of a faculty survey. Advances in Physiology Education, 31(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00057.2006 [in English].
Mokahal, A.E., Ahmad, A., Habib, J.R., Nasrallah, A.A., Francis, G., & Zgheib, N.K. (2021). Do Medical Students' Learning Styles and Approaches Explain Their Views and Behavior Regarding Lecture Attendance? Med Sci Educ, 31(5),1693–1702. doi:10.1007/s40670-021-01362-3. [in English].
Mattick, K., Crocker, G., Bligh, J. (2007). Medical student attendance at non-compulsory lectures. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 12(2), 201–210. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-5492-1. [in English].
Allers, N.J., Vreken, N.J. (2005). Active learning in Physiology practical work. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19(5), 853–862. doi:10.4314/sajhe.v19i5.25531. [in English].
Hartman, F.A. (2000). The Teaching of Physiology in the Medical School. Academic Medicine, 75(10), p. 985. [in English].
Animals in Medical Education and Research. Retrieved from https://www.aamc.org/what-we-do/mission-areas/medical-research/animals. [in English].
Annual Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals, Great Britain, 2020 (2021, July 15). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/statistics-of-scientific-procedures-on-living-animals-great-britain-2020/annualstatistics-of-scientific-procedures-on-living-animals-great-britain-2020. [in English].
Universities of the Netherlands (UNL) and the Netherlands Federation of University Medical Centres (NFU). Ambition statement on innovation in higher education using fewer laboratory animals. 2022. 31 p. Retrieved from https://www.nfu.nl/sites/default/files/2022-10/Streefbeeld_proefdiervrije_innovatie_in_het_%28post%29academisch_onderwijs.pdf. [in English].
Ahn, N., Park, J. & Roh, S. (2023). Use of laboratory animals and issues regarding the procurement of animals for research in Korea. Lab Anim Res. 39, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-023-00161-8. [in English].
Gericke, C., Kuhtz-Boehnke, M. (2022 May 12) Animal experimentation in higher education and animal-free teaching methods. Doctors Against Animal Experiments. Retrieved from https://www.aerzte-gegen-tierversuche.de/en/specific-infos/education-training/animal-experimentation-in-higher-education-and-animal-free-teaching-methods. [in English].
Guide For The Care And Use Of Laboratory Animals (8th ed). (2011). The National Academies Press, Washington. 246 p. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/guide-for-the-care-and-use-of-laboratory-animals.pdf. [in English].
Benmouloud, A., Charallah, S., Seridi, N., Raache, R., Aouichat, S.,&... Khammar, F. (2020) An overview of the welfare of animals used for scientific and educational purposes in Algerias. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science, 46 (4), 31–38. doi:10.23675/sjlas.v46i1.1043. [in English].
Mcvey, J.S. Last Remaining Medical School to Use Live Animals for Training Makes Switch to Human-Relevant Methods (2016, Jun 30). Retrieved from https://www.pcrm.org/news/news-releases/last-remaining-medical-school-use-liveanimals-training-makes-switch-human. [in English].
Izmirli, S., Aldavood, S.J., Yasar, A., Phillips, C.J.C. (2010.) Introducing Ethical Evaluation of the Use of Animals in Experiments in the Near East. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 38(4), 331–336. doi:10.1177/026119291003800410. [in English].
Mohr, B.J., Souilem, O., Abdussamad, A.M., Benmouloud, A., Bugnon, P., & Lewis, D.I. (2023). Sustainable education and training in laboratory animal science and ethics in low- and middle-income countries in Africa – challenges, successes, and the way forward. Lab Anim, 57(2):136–148. doi: 10.1177/00236772221129976. [in English].
Rodriguez-Triviño, C.Y., Pérez-Mendoza, L., Rincón-Guio, C. (2022). Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: An Innovation in Teaching Medical Physiology. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 12(5). P. 43–53. doi:10.36941/jesr-2022-0121. [in English].
Essop, F.M., Beselaar, L. (2020). Student response to a cooperative learning element within a large physiology class setting: lessons learned. Advances in Physiology Education, 3. 269–275. doi: 10.1152/advan.00165.2019. [in English].
Vázquez-García M. (2020). Strategies for the Collaborative Teaching of Physiological Sciences. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res | BJSTR 32(2), 24822-24825. doi: 10.26717/BJSTR.2020.32.005222. [in English].
Soundariya, K., Velusami, D. (2023). UNCLE (Unconventional Learning Exercises): An Innovative approach towards active learning in Physiology for I MBBS students. Global Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 1. 27–30. doi:10.25259/GJHSR_16_2022. [in English].
Bhandari, B., Mehta, B., Mavai, M., Singh, Y.R., Singhal, A. (2017). Jigsaw Method : An Innovative Way of Cooperative Learning in Physiology. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 61(3), 315–321. [in English].
Gilkar, S.A., Lone, S., Lone, R.A. (2016). Introduction of active learning method in learning physiology by MBBS students Int. J Appl Basic Med Res, 6(3), 186–190. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.186960. [in English].
Perkins, D.V., Saris , R.N. (2021). A «Jigsaw Classroom» technique for undergraduate statistics courses. Teaching ofPsychology, 22, 111–113. [in English].
Soundariya, K., Senthilvelou, M., Teli, S.S., Deepika, V., Selvi, K.S.,& Mangalavalli, M.S. (2021). Jigsaw technique as an active learning strategy in Physiology for I MBBS Student.s Biomedicine. 41(3), 654–659. doi: https://doi.org/10.51248/.v41i3.291. [in English].
Smits, P.B., de Buisonjé, C.D., Verbeek, J.H., van Dijk. F.J., Metz. J.C.,& ten Cate, O.J. (2003). Problem-Based Learning versus Lecture-Based Learning in Postgraduate Medical Education. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 29(4), 280–287. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40967300. [in English].
Tweedy, C. (2023). Problem-based learning for authentic assessment in a large class setting. Physiology News, 130,15. https://doi.org/10.36866/pn.130.15. [in English].
Tufts, M.A., Higgins-Opitz, S.B. (2009). What makes the learning of physiology in a PBL medical curriculum challenging? Student perceptions. AJP Advances in Physiology Education, 33(3), 187–195. doi: 10.1152/advan.90214.2008. [in English].
DePaepe, J., Campion, T. (2012). The Efficacy of Inquiry-based Learning in Undergraduate Physiology. Northwest Journal of Teacher Education, 10(1). Article 5, 43–52. doi: 10.15760/nwjte.2012.10.1.5. [in English].
Sánchez, J., Navarro-Galve, B., Lesmes, M., Rubio, M., Gal, B. (2023). Integrated laboratory classes to learn physiology in a psychology degree: impact on student learning and experience. Front Psychol, 14, 1266338. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1266338. [in English].
Sweeney G. (1999). The challenge for basic science education in problem-based medical curricula. Clin Invest Med, 22(1). P. 15–22. PMID: 10079991. [in English].
Alaagib N.A., Musa O.A., Saeed A.M. (2019). Comparison of the effectiveness of lectures based on problems and traditional lectures in physiology teaching in Sudan. BMC Med Educ, 19(1), 365. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1799-0. [in English].
Walters M.R. (2001). Problem-based learning within endocrine physiology lectures. Adv Physiol Educ, 25(1–4), 225–227. doi: 10.1152/advances.2001.25.4.225. [in English].
Ghosh S., Dawka V. (2000). Combination of didactic lecture with problem-based learning sessions in physiology teaching in a developing medical college in Nepal. Adv Physiol Educ, 24(1), 8–12. doi: 10.1152/advances.2000.24.1.8. [in English].
Goyal M., Agarwal M., Goel A. (2023). Interactive Learning: Online Audience Response System and Multiple Choice Questions Improve Student Participation in Lectures. Cureus, 15(7), e42527. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42527. [in English].
Sathishkumar S., Thomas N., Tharion E., Neelakantan N., Vyas R. (2007). Attitude of medical students towards Early Clinical Exposure in learning endocrine physiology. BMC Med Educ, 7, 30. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-30. [in English].
Gade S., Chari S. (2013). Case-based learning in endocrine physiology: an approach toward self-directed learning and the development of soft skills in medical students. Adv Physiol Educ, 37(4), 356–360. doi: 10.1152/advan.00076.2012. [in English].
Bennal A.S., Pattar M.Y., Taklikar R.H. (2016). Effectiveness of «case-based learning» in physiology. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 6(1), 65–67. doi: 10.5455/njppp.2015.5.1810201583. [in English].
Srinivasan M., Wilkes M., Stevenson F., Nguyen T., Slavin S. (2007). Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Acad Med, 82(1), 74–82. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000249963.93776.aa. [in English].
Sayma M., Williams H. (2016). A new method for teaching physical examination to junior medical students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 7, 91–97. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S100509. [in English].
Russell G., Ng A. (2009). Taking time to watch: observation and learning in family practice. Can Fam Physician, 55(9), 948–950. PMID: 19752265; PMCID: PMC2743595. [in English].
Berg R.M.G., Plovsing R.R., Damgaard M. (2012). Teaching baroreflex physiology to medical students: a comparison of quiz-based and conventional teaching strategies in a laboratory exercise. Adv Physiol Educ, 36(2), 147–153. doi:10.1152/advan.00011.2012. [in English].
Chen F., Lui A.M., Martinelli S.M. (2017). A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Med Educ, 51(6), 585–597. doi: 101111/medu13272 PMID: 28488303. [in English].
Lee Y.H., Kim K.J. (2018). Enhancement of student perceptions of learner-centeredness and community of inquiry in flipped classrooms. BMC Med Educ. 18(1), 242. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1347-3. [in English].
Lu C., Xu J., Cao Y., Zhang Y., Liu X.,&... Zhu H. (2023). Examining the effects of student-centered flipped classroom in physiology education. BMC Med Educ. 23, 233. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04166-8. [in English].
Suryawanshi M.K., Raut S.E. (2021). Use of flipped classroom as teaching learning method in Physiology. J Med Allied Sci, 11(1), 40–44. doi: 10.5455/jmas.104322. Retrieved from https://jmas.in/fulltext/154-1594998769.pdf?1704914413. [in English].
Street S.E., Gilliland K.O., McNeil C., Royal K.D. (2015). The Flipped Classroom Improved Medical Student Performance and Satisfaction in a Pre-clinical Physiology Course. Medical Science Educator, 25(1), 35–43. doi:10.1007/s40670-014-0092-4. [in English].
Ji M., Luo Z., Feng D., Xiang Y., Xu J. (2022). Short- and Long-Term Influences of Flipped Classroom Teaching in Physiology Course on Medical Students' Learning Effectiveness. Front Public Health. 10:835810. doi: 103389/fpubh2022835810. [in English].
Mu P. (2022). Research on Physiology Teaching Model Based on Virtual Reality. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology. 5(11). 109–114. doi: 10.23977/curtm.2022.051117. [in English].
Kolkhorst F., Mason C., DiPasquale D., Patterson P., Buono M. (2001). An inquiry-based learning model for an exercise physiology course. Advances in physiology education. 25(1–4), 117–122. doi: 10.1152/advances.2001.25.2.45. [in English].
Pant J., Pant M., Patil P.M. (2020). Exploring Physiology Through Working Model Preparation by Undergraduate Students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 11, 171–176. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S234171. [in English].
Pamplona A.V., Al-Saadi F.T., Al-Ghenaimi S.A. (2019). Anatomy and physiology model making project: Assessing students’ perceptions, learning gains and academic outcomes. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 9(2), 53–60. doi: 10.5430/jnep.v9n2p53. [in English].
Nóbrega C., Pereira M.A., Coelho C.A., Brás I., Mega A.C.,&... Vala H. Virtual Physiology: A Tool for the 21st Century. Updates on Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology. 2021 doi:10.5772/intechopen.99671. Retrieved from https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/79209. [in English].
Dubrowski R., Dubrowski A. (2018). Why Should Implementation Science Matter in Simulation-based Health Professions Education? Cureus. 10(12). P.e3754. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3754. [in English].
Seidel C., Richards B. (2001). Application of Team Learning in a Medical Physiology Course. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 76, 533–534. doi: 101097/00001888-200105000-00071. [in English].
Chong J.W., Lee J.C. (2022). Maximizing the benefits of team-based learning. Adv Physiol Educ. 46, 365. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00071.2022. [in English].
Magzoub A. (2023). Team-based learning. Could it be an effective strategy for teaching physiology to preclinical medical students? Physiology News 130, 30-32 https://doi.org/10.36866/pn.130.30. [in English].
Parmelee D., Michaelsen L.K., Cook S., Hudes P.D. (2012). Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no 65. Med Teach. 34(5), e275–287. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179. [in English].
McInerney M.J., Fink L.D. (2003). Team-based learning enhances long-term retention and critical thinking in an undergraduate microbial physiology course. Microbiol Educ. 4(1), 3–12. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v4i1.68. [in English].
Lerchenfeldt S., Kamel-ElSayed S., Patino G., Loftus S., Thomas D.M. (2023). A Qualitative Analysis on the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Team-Based Learning. Med Sci Educ. 33(4), 893–902. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01813-z. [in English].
Gera M., Rathod U., Karra-Aly A., Aluckal E., Abraham A. (2023). Team Based Learning Vs Problem Based Learning in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Eastern Journal of Medical Sciences. 8(1), 1–6. doi: 10.32677/ejms.v8i1.3795. [in English].
Zhang Z., Liu D., Luo X., Hu D., Wang Y.,& Xia L. (2023 March 29). The application of BOPPPS combined Case-Based Learning teaching mode in clinical practice of gastroenterology for eight-year medical program students. Research square. 2023. Preprint. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2714692/v1. Retrieved from https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2714692/v1/fbaa4bd8-cbcb-4a50-a1b4-bd882de833ca.pdf?c=1692296546. [in English].
Ma X., Zeng D., Wang J., Xu K., Li L. (2022 ). Effectiveness of bridge-in, objective, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary teaching strategy in Chinese medical education: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Front Med, Sec Healthcare Professions Education. 9–2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.975229. [in English].
Han F., Ellis R.A. (2022). Explaining medical students’ learning outcomes in blended course designs: combining selfreported and observational learning experiences. Adv Physiol Educ. 46. 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00121.2021. [in English].
Zhang X., Wen H., Li H., Huang Y., Lv C.,& Zhu H. (2023). Effectiveness of blended learning on improving medical student’s learning initiative and performance in the physiology study. Cogent Education. 10(1). doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2192150. [in English].
Popovic N., Popovic T., Dragovic I.R., Cmiljanic O. (2018). A Moodle-based blended learning solution for physiology education in Montenegro: a case study. Adv Physiol Educ. 42(1), 111–117. doi: 10.1152/advan.00155.2017. [in English].
Anderson L.C., Krichbaum K.E. (2017). Best practices for learning physiology: combining classroom and online methods. Adv Physiol Educ. 41, 383–389. doi: 10.1152/advan.00099.2016. [in English].
Liu X.-Y., Lu C., Zhu H., Wang X., Jia S.,& Wang Y.-F. (2022). Assessment of the effectiveness of BOPPPSbased hybrid teaching model in physiology education. BMC Medical Education 22, 217(2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03269-y. [in English].
Ashour O, Alkhatib A.M., Zureikat Q.A., Al-Shaikhli M., Ata B.B.,& Al-Ani A. (2023). Investigating medical students'
satisfaction towards video-based learning versus face-to-face lectures: a Jordanian tertiary teaching hospital experience. Korean J Med Educ. 35(1), 21–32. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.246. [in English].
Luder A. (2016). Lecture attendance by medical students – is it a compelling issue? Harefuah. 155(4), 223–225, 254–255. Hebrew PMID: 27323538. [in Hebrew].
El-Dwairi Q.A., Mustafeh I., Khatatbeh M., Malki M.I., Mustafa A.G. (2022). Medical education across three colleges of medicine: perspectives of medical students. Heliyon. 8(11): e11426. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11426. [in English].
Beronja B., Bubnjevic T., Tasic R., Gasic M., Kulic L., & Gazibara T. (2023). Comprehensive qualitative evaluation of the first ever full-time online course for medical students in one middle-income country. Libyan J Med. 18(1):2258665. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2023.2258665. [in English].
Zureick AH, Burk-Rafel J, Purkiss JA, Hortsch M (2018) The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ. 11(4), 366–376. doi: 10.1002/ase.1754. [in English].
Xu Y., Chen C., Ji M., Xiang Y., Han Y.,&... Luo Z. (2023). An online flipped classroom approach improves the physiology score and subsequent course scores of the top-performing students. Adv Physiol Educ, 47(3), 538–547. doi: 10.1152/advan.00060.2022. [in English].
Gal B., Busturia I., Garrido C. (2011). To be or not to be: the importance of attendance in integrated physiology teaching using non-traditional approaches. BMC Res Notes. 4. 360(2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-360. [in English].
Weston W. (2018). Do we pay enough attention to science in medical education? Can Med Educ J. 9(3), e109-e114. doi:10.36834/cmej.43435. [in English].
Sweeney G. (1999). The challenge for basic science education in problem-based medical curricula. Clin Invest Med. 22(1), 15–22. PMID: 10079991.
Soicher R.N., Becker-Blease K.A., Bostwick K.C.P. (2020). Adapting implementation science for higher education research: the systematic study of implementing evidence-based practices in college classrooms. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 5(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00255-0. [in English].
John T.A. (2011). Driving forces of biomedical science education and research in state-of-the arts academic medical centres: the United States as example. Afr J Med Med Sci. 40(2), 109–118. PMID: 22195377. [in English].
Physiological Objectives for Medical Students. London, The Physiological Society, July 2020. 28 р. Retrieved from https://static.physoc.org/app/uploads/2021/07/14093346/Medical-curriculum.pdf. [in English].