THE USE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR DEVELOPING PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCIES OF FUTURE PHYSICAL THERAPISTS DURING THE STUDY OF NORMAL AND FUNCTIONAL HUMAN ANATOMY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/health-2025.3.28

Keywords:

information and communication technologies, physical therapy, human anatomy, professional competencies, Briolight anatomical table, quality of rehabilitation education, digital technologies, clinical thinking

Abstract

The article is devoted to a comprehensive study of the relevance and impact of using information and communication technologies in the training process of future physical therapists during the study of the discipline “Normal and Functional Human Anatomy”. The relevance of the research is determined by the need to transform the medical education system in accordance with evidence-based medicine requirements, healthcare digitalization, and specific training needs for specialists under martial law conditions in Ukraine. The role of using the Briolight anatomical table (“Briolight- Ukraine”LLC) in forming key professional competencies of physical therapy specialists is analyzed, particularly in developing spatial, clinical, and biomechanical thinking, practical diagnostic skills, and the ability to integrate theoretical knowledge with practical skills necessary for effective rehabilitation practice. Methodologically, the study was based on a mixed design using quantitative and qualitative data collection methods, including comparative analysis of learning outcomes between experimental (39 students using anatomical table and 3D models) and control (39 students studying using traditional methods with conventional visual aids) groups among 78 first and second-year students of the “Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy” educational program at Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University from September 2023 to March 2025. The research instruments included an author-developed questionnaire with 25 questions, a standardized test with 50 tasks of different types, a learning activity observation protocol, and statistical processing methods using Shapiro – Wilk tests, t-tests, and Pearson correlation analysis. Statistically significant advantages of the experimental group were established across all studied parameters (p < 0,001): motivation increase by 30%, improvement in understanding functional relationships by 43,5%, clinical thinking development by 32,2%, spatial thinking by 26,5%, ability to integrate knowledge by 33,3%, and practical diagnostic skills by 32,8%. A strong positive correlation (r = 0,847, p < 0,001) was found between the duration of technology use and the level of formed competencies, with the coefficient of determination r² = 0,717 indicating that 71,7% of competency level variation is explained by the duration of working with the technology. Each additional hour of working with the anatomical table increases competency levels by 0,285 points on a 10-point scale. The advantages and challenges of implementing ICT in the educational process under martial law conditions are thoroughly examined, including economic constraints, technical problems, the need for faculty adaptation, risks of forming dependence on digital technologies, and potential reduction in tactile palpation skills. An optimal distribution of teaching methods was established: 40% – traditional methods, 35% – anatomical table, 25% – other digital technologies. Scientifically substantiated recommendations for a four-stage phased implementation of modern technologies (preparatory, pilot, expansion, integration) over 9–12 months are proposed to optimize the development of competencies of future physical therapists, which meet the requirements of modern evidence-based medicine, patientcentered approach, and healthcare sector digitalization. The research demonstrates that systematic use of interactive technologies significantly enhances professional training quality, prepares competitive specialists capable of effective work in modern healthcare systems, and enables adaptation to future industry challenges while maintaining the balance between technological innovation and traditional educational approaches.

References

Trentini F., Fante C., Manganello F., Testa M., Battist S. The Use of Digital Technologies in Physiotherapy Higher Education: a Mixed-Methods Study. BMC Medical Education. 2025. Vol. 24. P. 246. DOI: 10.33393/aop.2025.3334

Європейський досвід підготовки фізичних терапевтів: упровадження нових магістерських програм з фізичної терапії в Україні / О. Єжова та ін. 2021. DOI: 10.31392/NPU-nc.series15.2021.5(135).12

Кормільцев В., Лазарева О., Бісмак О., Брушко В., Гаврелюк С. Аналіз освітніх програм та навчальних планів з фізичної терапії у країнах Європи. Спортивна медицина і фізична реабілітація. 2022. № 2. С. 93–99. DOI: 10.32652/spmed.2022.2.93-99

Романюк А., Шевчук Т., Апончук Л., Майструк М., Кривов’яз С. Анатомічна освіта в реабілітаційних науках: сучасні виклики і шляхи вдосконалення. Physical culture and sport: scientific perspective. 2025. № 2. P. 241–252. DOI: 10.31891/pcs.2025.2.31

Mayer R.E. The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review. 2024. Vol. 36. P. 8. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

Якименко О., Себов Д., Рибак В., Коротаєва В., Маркіна К. Реалізація пацієнтоцентричного концепту надання реабілітаційної допомоги в умовах кластерної лікарні через співпрацю медичних та немедичних надавачів реабілітаційних послуг. 2024.

Trentini F., Fante C., Manganello F., Testa M., Battista S. The Use of Digital Technologies in Physiotherapy Higher Education: a Mixed-Methods Study. Archives of Physiotherapy. 2025. Vol. 15. P. 49–58. DOI: 10.33393/aop.2025.3334

The Anatomage Table: A Promising Alternative in Anatomy Education / K. Tsakalos et al. Cureus. 2023. Vol. 15. № 8. P. e43891. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43891

Копочинська Ю. Понятійний апарат системи формування професійної ідентичності майбутніх фахівців з фізичної терапії, ерготерапії. Український педагогічний журнал. 2020. № 2. С. 51–59. DOI: 10.32405/2411-1317-2020-2-51-59

Merolli M., Ahmed O., McCreesh K., Remedios L., Butler-Henderson K. Are physiotherapists expected to be competent in digital health practice? Meta-synthesis of international physiotherapy practice competency standards. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2024. Vol. 40. № 12. P. 2988–2999. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09593985.2023.2299202

Educational competencies for telehealth physical therapy: Results of a modified Delphi process / T.E. Davenport et al. Work. 2024. Vol. 77. № 4. P. 1055–1067. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11613078/

Community college student perceptions of digital anatomy models as a curricular resource / S. Baptiste et al. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2024. Vol. 17. № 6. P. 1213–1225. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2523

Ambler S.B., Burlis T.L., Clark B.R., Holtzman G.W., McGee P.N., Frost J.S., Randolph J.L., Norton B.J., Holleran C.L. Development of Domains of Competence and Competencies for Physical Therapist Education. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2025. Vol. 39. № 2. P. 101–109. DOI: 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000377

Milian Q.G., Fredieu J.R., Patel R.M. The current state of anatomy education in United States doctor of physical therapy programs. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2024. Vol. 17. № 3. P. 478–489. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2355

Does three‐dimensional anatomy improve student understanding? / A.E. Olszewski et al. Clinical Anatomy. 2020. Vol. 34. № 6. P. 868–876. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6916638/

The impacts of three-dimensional anatomical atlas on learning anatomy / H.S. Maresky et al. Annals of Anatomy. 2019. Vol. 224. P. 90–96. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449593/

Educators’ digital competence in physiotherapy and health professions education: Insights from qualitative interviews / H. Stepanyuk et al. Heliyon. 2024. Vol. 10. № 21. P. e39549. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11544660/

Estai M., Bunt S. Using 3D modeling techniques to enhance teaching of difficult anatomical concepts. Medical Teacher. 2016. Vol. 38. № 6. P. 583–588. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4808571/

Герасименко С., Панченко О., Буряк О. Цифрова трансформація медичної освіти в Україні: виклики та перспективи. Медична освіта. 2023. № 4. С. 45–52. DOI: 10.11603/me.2414-5998.2023.4.14127

Бочаров А., Слухенська Р., Іванушко Я. Підготовка фахівців з фізичної реабілітації в контексті діджиталізації вищої освіти. Науковий часопис Українського державного університету імені Михайла Драгоманова. Серія 15. 2024. № 1 (173). С. 38–41. DOI: 10.31392/UDU-nc.series15.2024.1(173).08

Левицький А., Макаренко О., Селюков О. Анатомічні технології у вищій медичній освіті: інноваційні підходи до навчання. Вісник проблем біології і медицини. 2023. № 3 (171). С. 112–125. DOI: 10.29254/2077-4214-2023-3-171-112-125

Мізь А., Герасимюк І., Ремінецький Б. Поєднання новітніх цифрових та класичних методів при викладанні анатомії людини у медичному закладі вищої освіти. Медична освіта. 2023. № 2. С. 97–102. DOI: 10.11603/m.2414-5998.2023.2.14018

Spitzer M. Digital Dementia and Cognitive Enhancement in Education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2024. Vol. 27. № 2. P. 23–31.

Published

2025-10-17

Issue

Section

THERAPY AND REHABILITATION